Dr. A.E. Redgate is a Lecturer in History, at Newcastle University, in Newcastle upon Tyne in the United Kingdom. She is an early medievalist who specialises in Armenian history, and she has an interest in comparative history and in world history.
2022 1-4955-1027-1 Very few early medieval Christian monarchs have left us evidence that gives us a personal impression of them: their ambitions, aspirations and policies, their characters, and, especially, how they wanted to be perceived and remembered. Four that have done are near-contemporaries. Three are, relatively, quite famous: Emperor Leo VI of Byzantium (reigned 886-912), his neighbor Tsar Symeon of Bulgaria (reigned 893-927), and King Alfred of Wessex (in southern England, in the island of Britain) (reigned 871-899). The fourth is Gagik Artsruni, prince of Vaspurakan, in the south of historic Armenia, which was part of the Arab Caliphate's province of Arminiyya. ...All four of these monarchs are perceptible through contemporary texts, and all of them engaged in artistic patronage, including building. In three cases (Leo's Alfred's, and Gagik's) a remarkable work of art survives that is personally associated with them. They thus provide a case study for comparative history, a discipline which has the potential to identify commonalities and differences, and to illuminate sources of, and influences upon, policies and ideas. In this particular case study, the evidence allows us to explore rulers' concepts of good rulership and how it should be expressed and advertised.
2024 1-4955-1245-2 This study, of royal portraits and concepts of good
kingship, was first conceived as the final chapter of a previous
one, Royal Building Programs in Tenth and Eleventh Century
Armenia: The Island City of Aghtamar. That had been intended
to address the island’s surviving tenth-century church and, and
in, its various contexts, particularly with regard to the functions
of cities and churches as settings for monarchs and for the
performance and display of monarchy. However, the amount of
material, and the possibility that some readers would be more
interested, at least initially, in portraits than building
programs, or vice versa, suggested the separate publication of
the discussion of royal portraits. These portraits are of two
kinds: graphic images and ‘pen-portraits’. The physical media of
the former are stone and paint.